Directory Services in the Telco world

Last week I was invited to a meeting with one of our customers,
a wireless telecom operator happily  user of Sun Directory Server 5.2 (patch3) with a few tens of million entries.

With the convergence of voice and data, the telcos are looking
for ways to reduce the number of databases they have and consolidate the
data in a single repository such as LDAP-based directory services.
The discussion went on the subject of the data models, the differences
between the LDAP model and the relational model, drifting to which model would be the
most appropriate in consideration with the Generic User Profile recommendation from the IMS specifications. Clearly the discussion was reaching the limits of my expertise (while
I’m quite confident in the LDAP area, IMS is not something that I’ve
followed), but it was very informative.

The one thing that I really found interesting in this discussion: at no
time, the consideration of performances was mentioned. It seemed obvious
for all parties that LDAP directory services (and probably more
specifically our Directory Server) do have the capability of keeping
with the high throughput and low response time requirements of the
network equipments.

And in fact, they really do. We will have some evidence of this with Directory
Server Enterprise Edition
6.0 very soon.

3 thoughts on “Directory Services in the Telco world

  1. James 20 December 2006 / 09:50

    Could you in your next blog entry share with us why the Telcos in this same situation shouldn’t switch to Active Directory and more importantly ADAM?

  2. Ludo 20 December 2006 / 12:14

    James,
    This is an interesting question… I’m not sure I am fully qualified to judge the performance and scalability of Active Directory or ADAM.
    What I know is that the few telcos that I interact with never, ever mentioned Windows as a platform they would deploy on. And It’s been a while since the last time someone mentioned ADAM in a competitive landscape, but being in the engineering team means that I only meet a few customers.
    Regards,
    Ludovic

  3. Michael Puskar 20 December 2006 / 16:58

    I can’t speak to ADAM, but one reason I could imagine is that the MS tools for managing AD can’t handle ou’s with more than a couple thousand entries. We have ou’s with 100’s of thousands of entries and syncing with AD is turning into real problem because of this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s